.30 M1 Carbine vs 7.62x39mm Ammo Comparison - Ballistics Info & Chart

The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .30 M1 Carbine vs 7.62x39mm ammo rounds. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, bullet weight, or jacketing type. As such, the following is for comparative information purposes only and should not be used to make precise predictions of the trajectory, performance, or true ballistics of any particular .30 M1 Carbine or 7.62x39mm rounds for hunting, target shooting, plinking, or any other usage. The decision for which round is better for a given application should be made with complete information, and this article simply serves as a comparative guide, not the final say.

For more detailed ballistics information please refer to the exact round in question or contact the manufacturer for the pertinent information. True .30 M1 Carbine and 7.62x39mm ballistics information can vary widely from the displayed information, and it is important to understand that the particular characteristics of a given round can make a substantive difference in its true performance.


Caliber Type Velocity
(fps)
Energy
(ft-lb)
.30 M1 Carbine Rifle 1990 960
7.62x39mm Rifle 2360 1590






Velocity


As illustrated in the chart, .30 M1 Carbine rounds - on average - achieve a velocity of about 1990 feet per second (fps) while 7.62x39mm rounds travel at a velocity of 2360 fps. To put this into perspective, a Boeing 737 commercial airliner travels at a cruising speed of 600 mph, or 880 fps. That is to say, .30 M1 Carbine bullets travel 2.3 times the speed of a 737 airplane at cruising speed, while 7.62x39mm bullets travel 2.7 times that same speed.

Various calibers



Energy



Furthermore, the muzzle energy of a .30 M1 Carbine round averages out to 960 ft-lb, while a 7.62x39mm round averages out to about 1590 ft-lb. One way to think about this is as such: a foot-pound is a unit of energy equal to the amount of energy required to raise a weight of one pound a distance of one foot. So a .30 M1 Carbine round exits the barrel with kinetic energy equal to the energy required for linear vertical displacement of 960 pounds through a one foot distance, while a 7.62x39mm round exiting the barrel has energy equal to the amount required to displace 1590 pounds over the same one foot distance. As a rule of thumb, when it comes to hunting, muzzle energy is what many hunters look at when deciding on what caliber of firearm / ammunition to select. Generally speaking, the higher the muzzle energy, the higher the stopping power.

Again, the above is for comparative information purposes only, and you should consult the exact ballistics for the particular .30 M1 Carbine or 7.62x39mm cartridge you're looking at purchasing.








Please click the above links to take a look at all of the .30 M1 Carbine and 7.62x39mm ammo we have in stock and ready to ship, and let us know any parting thoughts in the comment section below.





Foundry Outdoors is your trusted home for buying archery, camping, fishing, hunting, shooting sports, and outdoor gear online.

We offer cheap ammo and bulk ammo deals on the most popular ammo calibers. We have a variety of deals on Rifle Ammo, Handgun Ammo, Shotgun Ammo & Rimfire Ammo, as well as ammo for target practice, plinking, hunting, or shooting competitions. Our website lists special deals on 9mm Ammo, 10mm Ammo, 45-70 Ammo, 6.5 Creedmoor ammo, 300 Blackout Ammo, 10mm Ammo, 5.56 Ammo, Underwood Ammo, Buffalo Bore Ammo and more special deals on bulk ammo.

We offer a 100% Authenticity Guarantee on all products sold on our website. Please email us if you have questions about any of our product listings.



2 Comments

Jeffro - Mar 04, 2023 Good night! I have no problem making a comparison between two given numbers. From there, most 6th grade graduates (like myself) will easily convert said given numbers into a percentage or fractional notation expressing the same… Then we could compare the two to an airliner that weighs up somewhere around 150+TONS, the full fuel load alone being over 16,000 GALLONS, the two bullet weights, velocities, and kinetic energies not comparable with the values of the airliner in any way. Pretty sure we could dump a full extended magazine from a firearm of both calibers into a fully loaded 767 at takeoff and other than a little cosmetic damage, the airliner will still take off and land with no further difficulties. The comparison simply further confuses me the reader, that’s all…
wolf Ryet - Jul 04, 2023

You are correct in that the comparison to an airliner is way out of context. In comparison it would have been better to give comparisons to the .45 , which is what the carbine was intended to replace. Next in comparison would be a full power military round such as the .308 , and possibly the 5.56 both of which were used at the time of the 7.62 x39. After observing the effects of the 5.56, the Russians then went with their 5.45 × 39, Which is still in use .

Leave a comment

Comments have to be approved before showing up